From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 14 01:06:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7BA91065677 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 01:06:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx23.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 709D18FC2D for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 01:06:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 6956 invoked by uid 399); 14 Jul 2008 00:39:20 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 14 Jul 2008 00:39:20 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <487AA035.8070801@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 17:39:17 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080606) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: perryh@pluto.rain.com References: <48798b9d.0bgmwrViDqPyEGdk%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4879bdce.y5h8w8XA+d8w3XuK%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4879C26D.1020901@gmail.com> <200807131016.31598.jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk> <4879D026.8060407@gmail.com> <487a99e5.J/H87TLmSKivtwA7%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <487a99e5.J/H87TLmSKivtwA7%perryh@pluto.rain.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, sonic2000gr@gmail.com Subject: Re: PACKAGESITE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 01:06:04 -0000 perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: >>>> As far as I know, pkg_add will only fetch dependencies recursively >>>> from the Internet when used with -r but it will then ignore >>>> PKG_PATH. Seems what you are asking cannot be done this way ... >>> I wonder if portinstall -P (or even -PP) might do what the OP >>> wants? >> You are correct, according to the man page, portinstall -PP would >> be his best bet. > > Except that portinstall is part of portupgrade, which has its own > boatload of dependencies. Is there any way to do this with, say, > portmaster? Not yet. :) Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection