Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 19:39:52 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 261977] lang/gcc12-devel: enable LTO Message-ID: <bug-261977-29464-nIFvniUmu8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-261977-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-261977-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D261977 --- Comment #50 from Piotr Kubaj <pkubaj@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Matthias Andree from comment #47) For the standard bootstrap without LTO, I'm actually not sure what's the current motivation for that. I assume it's just safer, especially with the development snapshots. It changes when the port is switched to use LTO - which I did. Upstream provides no way to use LTO (unless you manually append -flto to CFLAGS / CXXFLAGS, but I trust upstream developers more). (In reply to Mark Millard from comment #48) I can confirm that LTO-related processes run in parallel with the full capa= city of the box. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-261977-29464-nIFvniUmu8>