From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 20 22:20:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E3E106564A; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:20:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.cksoft.de (mail.cksoft.de [IPv6:2001:4068:10::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 180C38FC12; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:20:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (amavis.fra.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A3A841C710; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:20:37 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de Received: from mail.cksoft.de ([192.168.74.103]) by localhost (amavis.fra.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QUYLdw37ZSmB; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:20:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 88AB341C71D; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:20:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1EC44496D; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:20:15 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:20:15 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Jack Vogel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20101020221142.L66242@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Net , FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: IPV6 Checksum offload and TSO6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:20:39 -0000 On Wed, 20 Oct 2010, Jack Vogel wrote: Hi, > I had occasion to think about this, and I was wondering if someone is > working to add > either or both of these features, Intel's hardware supports it, it does not > seem that > hard to add, or am I missing something? Strange that I had been thinking of that last night and talking to poeple today. It's kind of on the roadmap here for mid-November. It's mostly freebsd infrastructure that's missing for it (along with some cleanup on the flags in a couple of places). tuexen@ wanted to get the CSUM_* stuff done for SCTP as well but I haven't re-pinged him on that one yet. Do you know if we have Intel cards in the netperf cluster that can actually do it for testing? What's the matrix for the various cards for v6 offloads? TCP/UDP/SCTP? IP? TSO? TOE? Imho noone does TOE6 yet (correct me if wrong) but I'd like to get the others all sorted then. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome a new stage of life. Going to jail sucks -- All my daemons like it! http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html