From owner-freebsd-mobile Fri Oct 24 00:19:27 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA29095 for mobile-outgoing; Fri, 24 Oct 1997 00:19:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-mobile) Received: from word.smith.net.au (word.smith.net.au [202.0.75.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA29088 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 1997 00:19:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@word.smith.net.au) Received: from word.smith.net.au (localhost.smith.net.au [127.0.0.1]) by word.smith.net.au (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA02012; Fri, 24 Oct 1997 16:45:59 +0930 (CST) Message-Id: <199710240715.QAA02012@word.smith.net.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: John-Mark Gurney cc: Mike Smith , mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bus arch ramblings (was Re: Patches from -current for -stable ... In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 23 Oct 1997 23:59:08 MST." <19971023235908.26084@hydrogen.nike.efn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 24 Oct 1997 16:45:57 +0930 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > yep.. that's what the handler allows... my dummy module (the first that > > > I used to test the new code) scheduled a timeout.. then upon unloading > > > I used untimeout to remove it... > > > > ... which is exactly what you're arguing against above. I'm confused > > now. > > wierd... I thought I was arguing for the module tracking it's own > resources... and refusing to unload when it gets the unload event.. :) Um, I proposed a LOAD/UNLOAD event set, and I *thought* you were arguing against them, saying that such actions belonged in the attach/ detach routines. I think we have been in violent agreements. Whoops. > > I meant "where is your whiteboard"? I have that one already 8) > > ahh.. ok.. if someone could mail me an electronic whiteboard.. I'd > gladly use that instead... :) /usr/ports/mbone/wb mike