From nobody Fri Apr 14 06:07:20 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4PyQw354dwz44Wy5; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 06:07:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (mailserver.netfence.it [78.134.96.152]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PyQw31w0Fz3x0d; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 06:07:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from [10.1.2.18] (mailserver.netfence.it [78.134.96.152]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPSA id 33E67K81017479 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 14 Apr 2023 08:07:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host mailserver.netfence.it [78.134.96.152] claimed to be [10.1.2.18] Message-ID: <70dd5c7a-d37d-2463-ea34-e05c081ab325@netfence.it> Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 08:07:20 +0200 List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-hardware List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 Subject: Re: M2 NVME support Content-Language: en-US To: Freddie Cash , egoitz@ramattack.net, Freebsd fs , Freebsd hackers , freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org References: From: Andrea Venturoli In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.86 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4PyQw31w0Fz3x0d X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:35612, ipnet:78.134.0.0/17, country:IT] X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 4/13/23 18:43, Freddie Cash wrote: > If you want the best performance, and money isn't a restriction, then > you'll want to look into servers that have U.2 (or whatever the next-gen > small form factor interface name is) slots and backplanes.  The > drives cost a lot more than regular M.2 SSDs But, being "enterprise" drive, this is perhaps justified. Actually they can even cost less than (slower) SATA "enterprise" drives. Of course you'll need to add the cost of a controller, which you have almost always "for free" for SATA. bye av.