Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 10:47:46 -0700 From: bmah@CA.Sandia.GOV (Bruce A. Mah) To: Kiril Mitev <kiril@ideaglobal.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PGP ver.5 - is this the way its supposed to be ? Message-ID: <199907131747.KAA16844@stennis.ca.sandia.gov> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 13 Jul 1999 17:24:04 -0000." <199907131724.RAA34491@loki.ideaglobal.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==_Exmh_1368999908P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, Kiril Mitev wrote: > Just installed security/pgp5, which gives us /usr/local/bin/pgp5, but > running it gives the error: > > Invoked with unknown symlink > > My gut feeling is that is REALLY should be called bin/pgp, anyone care > to comment on that ? PGP 5 is a little different than PGP 2 in that it's designed to be invoked as a bunch of different commands, rather than one command with a flag to choose its behavior. So: pgpk Key management pgpe Encrypt (maybe sign too) pgps Sign pgpv Verify In reality, the last three are links to a single binary named pgp5. All four commands have manpages, and they'll all print help information if invoked without any flags or filenames. Hope this helps, Bruce. --==_Exmh_1368999908P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBN4t7wajOOi0j7CY9AQEb9QP/YEuSBcPryXx+y+ra/SFPbtAN412gnjhW +eD8UeB9mr9kD5DLVsBClrTvTkPZD3l6OUwF+DaAroSBJMJSINfs6/daeHCzV9Nu 08ARYpHkj+VXGGPiQsVD0WC/AzMEZHAJY/B43Mz3GPV2P8Mfqv5FH8Fo/m9AbLX8 TPONJDhj7+8= =Xbf3 -----END PGP MESSAGE----- --==_Exmh_1368999908P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907131747.KAA16844>