From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 31 05:10:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABB477C9 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 05:10:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com (mail-pa0-f53.google.com [209.85.220.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F4EF626 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 05:10:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id kx10so6969384pab.12 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 22:10:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=R5znHJRsCXwfTND2wigREdLP6cKbMb1BKhbDeTnfLpw=; b=cJdz76FEbCeFcW+mUDbPkKzPH8ONEkMXf3rhqEaa350nSqBAl5E1hyMDUxzbjKSRv/ zK9tAzd7nquddCcffzjqrCbRZj0Ssw2Vbv/wQUC9iOyqL67GP9jOEsS0dpPtN9Y8ABVD xsxPZk+UgJwGhowbZzTetA9iP1IKRKCmUH8cPExFxfqrQSUoDncAFkKzjhTr8vYrILZU ARP69R882dvqRApHeWxpmwMhltiyNRJHXclHq57Ih/1N/Z9+4bijIZxyr8VBa0rkfY0Z g+4yqSlZEtfflORwgyAYqhduzRkZsmPaJZm9x2e26SBHKb1i8Ex0syl3gsjk6DFqll0v aIbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlyG6FQwdk5YeOVT+xvT2hFgc9P1RsoiGodCxb3crcBI/DgLufHIuT35q8XLIqMxsYktLBA X-Received: by 10.66.145.234 with SMTP id sx10mr10488134pab.130.1414732209148; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 22:10:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-24-6-220-224.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.6.220.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id s9sm8689609pdp.1.2014.10.30.22.10.06 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 30 Oct 2014 22:10:07 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: how to kernel printf a int64_t? From: Tim Kientzle In-Reply-To: <439339249.2551223.1414702876172.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 22:09:58 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <97A82163-E78D-457E-B649-B243B41A6C6F@kientzle.com> References: <439339249.2551223.1414702876172.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> To: Rick Macklem X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Cc: Freebsd hackers list X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 05:10:16 -0000 On Oct 30, 2014, at 2:01 PM, Rick Macklem wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I feel kinda dumb asking this, but... > int64_t i; >=20 > printf("%qd\n", (u_quad_t)i); >=20 > works but looks dorky, to put it technically;-). > Is there a better way to printf() a int64_t in the kernel? I often use the following to print large integers: printf(=93%jd\n=94, (intmax_t)i); Tim