From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 17:19:22 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C2512D859; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:19:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from romain@blogreen.org) Received: from marvin.blogreen.org (blogreen.org [88.161.59.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46dlCs68pmz4BsQ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:19:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from romain@blogreen.org) Received: by marvin.blogreen.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D3281C3B18; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:19:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:19:16 +0200 From: Romain =?iso-8859-1?Q?Tarti=E8re?= To: George Hartzell Cc: FreeBSD Questions , freebsd-ports Subject: Re: Problem overriding ports with portshaker. Message-ID: <20190925171916.GA37113@blogreen.org> Mail-Followup-To: George Hartzell , FreeBSD Questions , freebsd-ports References: <23943.45748.104392.96450@alice.local> <23945.3567.44900.631073@alice.local> <20190925041645.GA11443@blogreen.org> <23947.37724.943422.207082@alice.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <23947.37724.943422.207082@alice.local> X-PGP-Key: http://romain.blogreen.org/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46dlCs68pmz4BsQ X-Spamd-Bar: ------ X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.02 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[blogreen.org:s=marvin]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[blogreen.org:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[blogreen.org,quarantine]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; IP_SCORE(-1.02)[ipnet: 88.160.0.0/12(-3.16), asn: 12322(-1.94), country: FR(-0.00)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12322, ipnet:88.160.0.0/12, country:FR]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:19:22 -0000 --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Problem overriding ports with portshaker. On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 09:18:36AM -0700, George Hartzell wrote: > Setting PORTSDIR fixes it for me (different directory, but it works). Excellent! I released portshaker 1.0.18 which address your issue and updated the port accordingly. Thank you for reporting it. Regards, Romain --=20 Romain Tarti=E8re http://romain.blogreen.org/ pgp: 8234 9A78 E7C0 B807 0B59 80FF BA4D 1D95 5112 336F (ID: 0x5112336F) (plain text =3Dnon-HTML=3D PGP/GPG encrypted/signed e-mail much appreciated) --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGzBAABCAAdFiEEgjSaeOfAuAcLWYD/uk0dlVESM28FAl2LoZQACgkQuk0dlVES M29tngv+Jgjo3pqcn82MVlMj5n47NPK6/tvRvA0MypFqIxFLWMeNrQ41yjcdYBZy HBVek9LJMxguFvUm5/cFLBb1EORLt88/I96ZQZQ8KWMqM8Yc7kLcoUdoh0VsDEpq 5uunZgMECBPvuCI8Q2Lq01P9Jt2DbnBIur4FWxdmh8WVPq4Yw6zyBMSeD8SBFrKC mY5BGu2pA12r/7mVgqqeIxgbc25GqWlXBol5mJfHUmevZnIyB9+vhhw5PUUlb1MA /2a3+5kg2c/hnTKhdSFrQPWtzs/Hz5VJN1dvD+Fg5FRTur8DLS3ffYATIZtMjR7I kiw6kQ6LgIoh6vI9kPNUQv9uXJwsWy3CRsPJWe7jRljCoBEUXWDDfCQZmheXde7U cOg+gZEe47yveEqp0Hs8pE9clacH8+qq2zMZZE5k3+8WmYZemghwtN+4VExPW4yO ayqSEF3RV3EVHgj0PusOtcOLdDEnC8poLAmY9wSjbWkoRX0wM9rbdVzyT9TyEVV2 C+4NaYnp =0tar -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw--