Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 19:44:21 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bernhard_Fr=F6hlich?= <decke@bluelife.at> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru> Cc: "ports@freebsd.org Ports" <ports@freebsd.org>, Jason bacon <jwbacon@tds.net> Subject: Re: [QAT] r334788: 1x depend (depend_package in databases/rrdtool), 3x leftovers Message-ID: <CAE-m3X3YoGN3DDhPn6UgFF1ME9mC9VPZTpa3OxVNU%2BQDFEQYJA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5293891F.4080607@passap.ru> References: <E1VkgMl-000AjC-BO@qat.redports.org> <529310AE.7050805@passap.ru> <52935DFB.5080602@tds.net> <5293891F.4080607@passap.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 25.11.2013 18:30 schrieb "Boris Samorodov" <bsam@passap.ru>: > > (reformatted for consistency sake) > > 25.11.2013 18:26, Jason bacon =D0=C9=DB=C5=D4: > > On 11/25/13 2:56 AM, Boris Samorodov wrote: > >> > >> I'm not sure how to deal with /home/$USER leftovers (i.e. while > >> package install a new user/group is created and while package > >> deinstalled /home/$USER becomes a leftover, but we display a > >> message that a user should be removed manually): > >> > >> [...] > >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D<phase 7: = make package>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > >> =3D=3D=3D> Building package for slurm-2.6.4 > >> Deleting slurm-2.6.4 > >> Deinstallation has been requested for the following 1 packages: > >> > >> slurm-2.6.4 > >> > >> The deinstallation will free 51 MB > >> [1/1] Deleting slurm-2.6.4...=3D=3D> You should manually remove the "slurm" > >> user. > >> done > >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > >> > >> =3D=3D=3D Checking filesystem state > >> list of extra files and directories in / (not present before this port > >> was installed but present after it was deinstalled) > >> 30528 8 drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel > >> 64 Nov 24 20:32 home > >> 34619 0 drwxr-xr-x 2 slurm slurm > >> 0 Nov 24 20:32 home/slurm > >> [...] > >> > > The files in /home/$USER (and /var) should be preserved. Deinstalls ma= y > > be part of an upgrade process, vs permanent removal, and some of these > > files contain usage statistics needed by sysadmins for reporting. > > > > I would suggest the following deinstall message: > > > > "You may remove /home/$USER if you are no longer using SLURM." > > Yep, that is the question: why did QAT suggests manuall removing > _and_ exit with error code? With my QAT hat on I consider this a false positive. You can safely ignore that complain from QAT.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAE-m3X3YoGN3DDhPn6UgFF1ME9mC9VPZTpa3OxVNU%2BQDFEQYJA>