Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 01:13:00 -0400 From: Jason Hellenthal <jhellenthal@dataix.net> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: named/bind98... rather ports usage and base interaction. Message-ID: <20120325051300.GA78476@DataIX.net> In-Reply-To: <4F6E40BC.6020400@FreeBSD.org> References: <20120323154105.GB84340@DataIX.net> <4F6E40BC.6020400@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 02:46:36PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 3/23/2012 8:41 AM, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > > > > Hey Doug, > > > > Do you know of anything we could do to stop the following from happening > > ? > > Yes, see below. > > > If you set world to build without BIND and it is your intention to use > > bind from ports... upon running (make delete-old) > > I don't like the delete-old stuff, and make no efforts to support it. > That said, the solution to your problem is to not use WITHOUT_BIND, but > to use the various other WITHOUT_BIND_* knobs, except for > WITHOUT_BIND_ETC. Yes, this is clunky; no, I have no plans to change it. > > Just to followup and say thanks again... This is what I was looking for. I ended up with just these to accomplish what I wanted on stable/8 machines: /etc/src.conf WITHOUT_BIND_DNSSEC=YES WITHOUT_BIND_LIBS_LWRES=YES WITHOUT_BIND_NAMED=YES WITHOUT_BIND_UTILS=YES And did not use: WITHOUT_BIND_ETC WITHOUT_BIND_MTREE Works as expected. Thanks again Doug. -- ;s =;
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120325051300.GA78476>