From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 26 15:22:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id E9E63CA4; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 15:22:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 15:22:29 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Pawel Pekala Subject: Re: svn commit: r323650 - in head/sysutils/fusefs-zip: . files Message-ID: <20130726152229.GA41531@FreeBSD.org> References: <201307251531.r6PFV3jV077526@svn.freebsd.org> <20130726012309.GA53090@FreeBSD.org> <20130726155801.6232cd87@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130726155801.6232cd87@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 15:22:30 -0000 On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 03:58:01PM +0200, Pawel Pekala wrote: > To ensure we have libzip at version 0.11.1 or higher I don't any other > less messy way of doing this. This was added by maintainer in revised > patch so I guess port don't build with earlier versions of libzip. I see; however, I am not sure how warranted are these types of checks; I mean, people usually update their ports tree entirely (and for a good reason; in fact, they are advised to do so). So I find it unlikely that user building new version of this port would be doing it with older version of the libzip (with was updated on July 14th, almost two weeks ago). If he or she does, well -- apparently they know what they're doing and thus should be prepared for possible fuckups. ;-) ./danfe