From owner-freebsd-security  Tue Oct  3  0:39:23 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from silby.com (cb34181-c.mdsn1.wi.home.com [24.183.3.139])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11ED637B66C
	for <security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue,  3 Oct 2000 00:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 32333 invoked by uid 1000); 3 Oct 2000 07:40:30 -0000
Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 3 Oct 2000 07:40:30 -0000
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 02:40:30 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
To: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>
Cc: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com>,
	Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>,
	"Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.ORG>, security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc inetd.conf 
In-Reply-To: <200010030426.WAA21046@nomad.yogotech.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010030239340.32324-100000@achilles.silby.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Nate Williams wrote:

> > > Can we please loose everything but telnet and ftp?  This getting
> > 
> > That wouldn't bother me at all.
> 
> I think the 'internal' auth should be on as well, since sendmail (for
> silly reasons) likes it on, and the internal version is silly enough to
> keep sendmail happy.
> 
> 
> Nate

Isn't sendmail just as happy getting a RST back when it tries to
connect?  Auth seems to fall under the too much info category for a
default install.

Mike "Silby" Silbersack



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message