From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Oct  1 15:50:35 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9208E16A41F;
	Sat,  1 Oct 2005 15:50:35 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com)
Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1681E43D46;
	Sat,  1 Oct 2005 15:50:34 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1])
	by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D55613F;
	Sat,  1 Oct 2005 10:50:29 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024) with ESMTP
	id 15219-06; Sat,  1 Oct 2005 10:50:24 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [216.201.118.138] (racerx.makeworld.com [216.201.118.138])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7965C613B;
	Sat,  1 Oct 2005 10:50:23 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <433EB047.4070809@makeworld.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 10:50:31 -0500
From: Chris <racerx@makeworld.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20050930)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, 
	FreeBSD - Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
References: <20051001085358.GA62022@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
	<20051001154628.GA64006@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20051001154628.GA64006@xor.obsecurity.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.3.3 (20050822) at makeworld.com - Isn't it
	ironic
Cc: scottl@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 6.0R todo list - hash sizes
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: RacerX@makeworld.com
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 15:50:35 -0000

Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 10:53:58AM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote:
> 
>>Hi,
>>
>>scottl@ removed:
>>    <td>Nullfs (and perhaps other filesystems) use an absurdly small
>>     hash size that causes significant performance penalties.</td>
>>
>>this item from 6.0R todo list. How was this solved? I didnt see any commits
>>to enlarge the hash values. Its still the same... why it was removed then?
> 
> 
> It was an incorrect suggestion on my part - it turns out this was not
> the cause of the performance penalties, and Jeff fixed them long ago.
> 
> Kris
> 

Somewhat off topic - what's the status of 6.0? The info on
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.0R/schedule.html
Has not been updated in some time and we're still on Beta5

-- 
Best regards,
Chris

Things equal to nothing else are equal to each other.