Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 23 Feb 2008 17:16:24 +0100 (CET)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        =?koi8-r?Q?=E1=CC=C5=CB=D3=C1=CE=C4=D2_=E4=C5=D2=C5=D7=D1=CE=CB=CF?= <aeder@list.ru>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Derek Ragona <derek@computinginnovations.com>
Subject:   Re: Re: tape splitter
Message-ID:  <20080223171607.W2920@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <E1JSqCT-0004IR-00.aeder-list-ru@f108.mail.ru>
References:  <E1JSqCT-0004IR-00.aeder-list-ru@f108.mail.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 2. Outputs chunks in specified directory. You can configure it to write directly to tape, but it's not the best solution.
> 3. Can be configured to write only N chunks and after that wait for SIGUSR1 to write next.
> 4. Can be configured to write MD5-digest of every piece in separate file.
>
> I use it to make 45Gb backup on the DVD's every week at Friday. It takes approximatelly 30 minutes of my time and 6 hours of real time (i need to replace DVD's and write labels on them). It takes 12 DVD's and cost 6$.
>
> If you tapes is not very huge (< 4Gb) you will be better to use DVD's. Write once DVD is available ~0.5$ is you bought 100 at once.
> DVD is more reliable then tapes, and you can just put old backups on the shelf for long storage.
> For daily delta-backups you can use few DVD-RW.
>
>
i have 100GB tape drive. thanks for your program!



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080223171607.W2920>