From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 8 04:05:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEBD537B401 for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 04:05:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cicero2.cybercity.dk (cicero2.cybercity.dk [212.242.40.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73E443F75 for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 04:05:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from db@traceroute.dk) Received: from user1.cybercity.dk (fxp0.user1.ip.cybercity.dk [212.242.41.34]) by cicero2.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C736B18F71C; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 13:05:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from main (port132.ds1-arsy.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.239.73]) by user1.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B1A268B4A; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 13:05:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 13:13:39 +0200 From: Socketd To: Terry Lambert , hackers@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20030708131339.16da151f.db@traceroute.dk> In-Reply-To: <3F0A9A1C.25E6EB35@mindspring.com> References: <20030707012205.3103dfc8.db@traceroute.dk> <20030707153314.GA1695@webboy.soth.at> <20030707180252.44036c61.db@traceroute.dk> <3F0A9A1C.25E6EB35@mindspring.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: 5 "Advanced" networking questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 11:05:21 -0000 On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 03:17:00 -0700 Terry Lambert wrote: > Socketd wrote: > > Ok, anyway to prevent sending ICMP's when ttl = 0? Or do I need a > > firewall? > > I guess you want to do this so that you can break path MTU > discovery and fail to properly exchange packets with the DF > bit set in the headers, and which don't take into account > intermediate links with smaller MTUs, like VPNs or PPPOE > links? > > What exactly are you getting from disabling ICMP, besides a > broken network connection to some systems you may wish to be > able to exchange packets with? I don't want to disable ICMP, just don't want to respond when ttl=0, meaning when my firewall/gateway is on a "traceroute path". br socketd