Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 23:04:16 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@puchar.net> To: Gordon Bergling <gbergling@gmail.com> Cc: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Ars Technica article on FreeBSD new user experience Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.20.2004112303150.72866@puchar.net> In-Reply-To: <1FFE298E-A609-4570-A0BD-E530996C92CF@gmail.com> References: <CAPyFy2AVfEzey0%2B9-b8ZS1uyn8ODOoNhCHY7fHp2uc9ASiw%2BnA@mail.gmail.com> <1FFE298E-A609-4570-A0BD-E530996C92CF@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I read this article a few times in detail, but some parts are still driving me nuts. I agree that FreeBSD isn’t maybe that best Operating System for the Desktop User, but please, nailing it all down on the installation experience is strange at least. I think, it would good to have an official response from the FreeBSD Foundation, to say at least. > What do you expect from article written by someone without any real knowledge? One more software "in collection". installed, seen, wrote article, deleted.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.20.2004112303150.72866>