From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Feb  1 09:43:22 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0CF16A4CE
	for <FreeBSD-Net@FreeBSD.Org>; Sun,  1 Feb 2004 09:43:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F6143D3F
	for <FreeBSD-Net@FreeBSD.Org>; Sun,  1 Feb 2004 09:43:13 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from bms@spc.org)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A761065400; Sun,  1 Feb 2004 17:43:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with LMTP id 17376-04; Sun,  1 Feb 2004 17:43:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from saboteur.dek.spc.org (82-147-17-88.dsl.uk.rapidplay.com
	[82.147.17.88])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F3E3D651EB; Sun,  1 Feb 2004 17:43:10 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by saboteur.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id E4775CE; Sun,  1 Feb 2004 17:43:09 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 17:43:09 +0000
From: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org>
To: Bob Van Valzah <BVanValz@tibco.com>
Message-ID: <20040201174309.GH705@saboteur.dek.spc.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Bob Van Valzah <BVanValz@tibco.com>,
	FreeBSD-Net@FreeBSD.Org
References: <1075477392.83564.4.camel@NewStorm.War.Tibco.Com>
	<20040130164551.GE732@saboteur.dek.spc.org>
	<1075504819.83564.133.camel@NewStorm.War.Tibco.Com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1075504819.83564.133.camel@NewStorm.War.Tibco.Com>
cc: FreeBSD-Net@FreeBSD.Org
Subject: Re: PIM IPv4 user-level process
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2004 17:43:22 -0000

On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 05:20:19PM -0600, Bob Van Valzah wrote:
> A port of the whole xorp world might be a better target than just the
> pim part.  That wouldn't take much since it compiled easily.  But it is
> a whopper--nearly 1 GB required to build.

XORP would be good as a separate port, but for PIM alone, the USC code
might be a better starting point. I think XORP has a much wider scope;
considering it's an alternative to Quagga et al.

BMS