From owner-freebsd-chat  Sun Mar  2 19:51:02 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA25902
          for chat-outgoing; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 19:51:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA25897
          for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 19:50:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA12185; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 19:50:43 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199703030350.TAA12185@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96
To: "David Langford" <langfod@dihelix.com>
cc: taob@risc.org (Brian Tao), jkh@time.cdrom.com, henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu,
        freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: New team roster list! (was Re: RSA 56-bit key challenge) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 02 Mar 1997 17:26:13 -1000."
             <199703030326.RAA11892@caliban.dihelix.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 1997 19:50:43 -0800
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>From The Desk Of "David Langford" :
> I was very suprised to see how poorly even the newer SGI boxes were doing.
> Anyone know if the client were compiled with gcc or the more optimized
> SGI compiler?

Good question, given that SGI has about 100 people or so working in their
compiler 8)

I didn't hesitate to tell Bettina, my girlfriend, who works at SGI.

Actually, the hold thing is sad because gcc can definitely use further
optimizations and the Win95 and WindowsNT folks I don't know whats their
story at all.

	Amancio