From owner-freebsd-security Wed Aug 12 19:27:09 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA23494 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 19:27:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from Tyr.office.EFN.org ([204.214.99.45]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA23487 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 19:27:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from spy@tyr.office.efn.org) Received: from Tyr.office.EFN.org (IDENT:spy@Tyr.office.EFN.org [204.214.99.45]) by Tyr.office.EFN.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id TAA22685; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 19:26:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 19:26:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Ben Reply-To: ben@efn.org To: andrewr cc: ben@efn.org, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Possible security "risk" in ftp client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Maybe I'm mistaken, but ps(1) get's the info from /dev/kmem and /dev/mem and formats them according to /kernel, what would I need to patch? On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, andrewr wrote: > > > On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Ben wrote: > > > For ps I made a patch that allows only root(or wheel, you pick) to use the > > flag '-a', otherwise the user attempting to use '-a' only gets his/her proc's. > > Did you patch the kernel as well? Caue if you didn't, it's useless. -ben@efn.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message