From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 20 11:18:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA96916A40F for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:18:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from postman.atlantis.dp.ua (postman.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.47.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B1543CB4 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:18:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (smtp.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.231]) by postman.atlantis.dp.ua (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kBKBIdSc085239 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:18:40 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:18:39 +0200 (EET) From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20061219175917.L84683@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> Message-ID: <20061220130559.P54963@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> References: <20061219175917.L84683@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: ddb(4) spoils kernel stack in CURRENT? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:18:50 -0000 Hello! On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: > I've tried to repeat this under the RELENG_6 as of 30-Oct (just removing > kernel options COMPAT_43TTY, COMPAT_FREEBSD6, INVARIANTS, INVARIANT_SUPPORT, > and using 'debug.kdb.enter' instead of 'debug.kdb.panic') - and kgdb unwinds > the stack even if the dump got via typing 'panic' from ddb: Today I've tried this with the fresh (20-Dec) RELENG_6 and with INVARIANTS* (so the only difference between kernel configs are CURRENT-only options COMPAT_43TTY and COMPAT_FREEBSD6). No differences - kgdb successfully unwinds the stack under RELENG_6. It seems that the following stands: > So it looks like a regression in CURRENT vs RELENG_6 (either ddb 'spoils' the > stack somehow, or kgdb fails to unwind it). Sincerely, Dmitry -- Atlantis ISP, System Administrator e-mail: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE