From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Nov  8 14:04:45 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66FD738;
 Thu,  8 Nov 2012 14:04:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C372D8FC14;
 Thu,  8 Nov 2012 14:04:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua
 [212.40.38.101])
 by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id QAA17372;
 Thu, 08 Nov 2012 16:04:37 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <509BBBF4.9080305@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 16:04:36 +0200
From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:16.0) Gecko/20121029 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
Subject: Re: removing support for ICC??
References: <CAF6rxgmTGsg6JMp5tswDGE4TZNcjirMJ8aiKLcSfd-ehbp_WYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20121107221730.000017c1@unknown>
In-Reply-To: <20121107221730.000017c1@unknown>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>, bde@FreeBSD.org,
 freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 14:04:45 -0000

on 07/11/2012 23:17 Alexander Leidinger said the following:
> cdefs.h is not only used in the kernel, but also in the userland.
> Anything from userland which includes cdefs.h and may also compile on
> other operating systems benefits from keeping this support in cdefs.h.

Do you _honestly_ believe in this?
That somebody might compile something using our cdefs.h on other OS and might use
the Intel compiler for that and the compilation might even work with the version
of icc that they use?

P.S. I am not questioning your statement, just really curios, because I have never
heard about such things before.

-- 
Andriy Gapon