From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Wed Jun 29 19:40:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C02FB86E5D for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 19:40:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shettyrn22@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x232.google.com (mail-wm0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D15B22F58 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 19:40:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shettyrn22@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x232.google.com with SMTP id 187so293168wmz.1 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 12:40:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=guOYPu3oDHUHdGIJo0+aXPJLdvH0OhBZVo5WaTQ+I6M=; b=rpSb5M/K70MuBxCHCxGR6wUJhH6FpYXjm9lqQod2ZoMs0b3iqpIXEsrY5KLJ71/iBg Z/ls6xoKuxeK2x319FipjqpxMYIs93wDm0N7e59+z0mRdgUgLt+xCOb1biElhbtqvZSp wFv2GjpBT8ewNezSluBTRaJ442risgmHUXKGU4i5c9HXF2Nd2f7xPeyq+w+eKjKF4bhX JVjfHfiOBdfvtNasHjvCqU1e9GRZ7+xReieP5JBDVHi/Tok07aRaePLcII0eClRxQxQy s9XYnTRH6KWWnYGoMxeN6ueWWmJpmxbcRe8YK0yPpB6FXa5O5Zc3hlgpHHKZNjOz6Vqf 5DTw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=guOYPu3oDHUHdGIJo0+aXPJLdvH0OhBZVo5WaTQ+I6M=; b=hPtdr8dFLHX/muIXduDFR7Kdm/7n5v2fgk3+cqy6sFbGscBuAs/AylMHqDjfot8l8t j+j5ooFNiYvAD98fA4ZLNIqtadPB6alrhcV90hVoOxX0DTVq07Y642u5EgCqosA391ez A4ETHKxqB5dPQj5Xb+Tw5FWopwuuahQJZk21jvz8qlk9xyh4S7yh7UsHcItwjX0yTDxi AHt8U7qR1FJ04tA8fPPU4alt6gjZ02DwIVhYBf+H62kqHUfQemfJEJ4J/qXedbMd9mj8 wz9O+/h50mbz5YkurM/xRyvKUbk5Oi0seFHy251nOaF1mcqoLCnbKo6m+vJFt6v2fWsj DBXg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJp/A2zQqL3kQepgLIjwx4zBm1VPDPabWXn+YHqfOZExEBDxPzVw9C0SSSWEbngpNTBWT+Ijz6WEeweVw== X-Received: by 10.28.17.132 with SMTP id 126mr23556680wmr.90.1467229223132; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 12:40:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.88.129 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 12:39:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Rajneesh Shetty Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 01:09:43 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Microsoft Paint & NXP Semiconductors To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 19:40:26 -0000 *To whom it may concern* *I found your group when one of your online subscribers had a problem in the BSD Group. Although I did not react to his protests, I would like you to know, that I am sympathetic to his concerns. I am however unable to locate his email ID.* *The purpose of this email is to let you know that I would like to assist your GROUP with two software programs written by myself with the assistance of my friends from University between 1989-1995. The "i squared C", bus architecture is a proprietary architecture to NXP Semiconductors, an offshoot of Phillips, Holland. We wrote a non-volatile program for DC Loads and a Microsoft solution called "PC Paint=E2=80=9D. * *Trust your clients & team mates have not been disappointed by our efforts. I have no hesitation in being grateful to Microsoft Corporation, Intel Corporation and AMD (Radeon) after all these years of their incessant efforts to keep these technologies alive. * *Any suggestions you may have with regards to contributing to efforts already made would be appreciated here.* *Regards,* *Rajneesh * Tel : (+91) 8711 9653 19 http://www.i2c-bus.org/i2c-bus/ http://www.telos.info/download/i2c-studioframework/ Weblog : www.rns-thoughts.blogspot.com On 29 June 2016 at 17:30, wrote: > Send freebsd-hackers mailing list submissions to > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > freebsd-hackers-owner@freebsd.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of freebsd-hackers digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: The small installations network filesystem and users. > (Julian Elischer) > 2. Re: The small installations network filesystem and users. > (Wojciech Puchar) > 3. Re: The small installations network filesystem and users. > (Wojciech Puchar) > 4. Re: The small installations network filesystem and users. > (Eduardo Morras) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 21:04:45 +0800 > From: Julian Elischer > To: Gerrit K?hn , Daniel Eischen > > Cc: freebsd-fs , FreeBSD Hackers > > Subject: Re: The small installations network filesystem and users. > Message-ID: <761f82d3-ebe9-2cba-9499-049dafbc98df@freebsd.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dwindows-1252; format=3Dflowed > > On 21/06/2016 1:56 PM, Gerrit K?hn wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 22:00:31 -0400 (EDT) Daniel Eischen > > wrote about Re: The small installations network > > filesystem and users.: > > > > DE> We should support LDAP client out of the box, in base. What > > DE> sucks now is that we need 3 packages (plus their dependencies) > > DE> and multiple config files for ldap: > > DE> > > DE> pam_ldap > > DE> nss_ldap > > DE> openldap-client > > > > I only have to install/config ldap-clients every now and then, but I > would > > also strongly favour a more "integrated" setup (if that requires having > it > > in base is a different question, though). A few weeks ago I used > > nss-pam-ldapd instead of pam_ldap and nss_ldap for the first time, and = it > > appeared to work with a bit less of a hassle for me (otoh, I don't do a= ny > > funky things here, I just need a replacement for what we did with NIS > > something like 20 years ago). > > +1 > I just had to reinstall certs for my server. which means copying > certs to several places (in a default config) > sendmail and syrus ad openssl (base) all look in different places. you > COULD make them all look in the same place > but that requires undersanding what is going on and not just cribbing > the config file off the net somewhere. > > I think ports and pkg are fine, but we need to have some more thought > put into how they all go together. > > > > > > > cu > > Gerrit > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 17:23:22 +0200 (CEST) > From: Wojciech Puchar > To: Chris Watson > Cc: Zaphod Beeblebrox , freebsd-fs > , FreeBSD Hackers > > Subject: Re: The small installations network filesystem and users. > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DUS-ASCII; format=3Dflowed > > > > On Mon, 20 Jun 2016, Chris Watson wrote: > > > I'm glad you brought this up. I wanted to but I've heard it before on > the lists and realize that there is this disconnect between the developer= s > doing the actual work to implement these things and the end users. > > > > I have always been very grateful to all the developers who over the > years, and I've been a FreeBSD consumer since the late 90s? And attended = my > first usenix/freenix conf in Monterrey in 2001?, have done some really ha= rd > work on many many things in FreeBSD. For zero pay. But the thing that has > always bothered me about a lot of it is, it's just to complex to use for > most end users. Not all. But people want to get work done. Sifting throug= h > .conf files, googling howtos, spending more time configuring it than > installing it has always been an issue. Developers in general do not thin= k > like an end user. And this leads to non developers just going "screw it > I'll just get it running on Linux with my GUI installer." Which is why > FreeNas is so popular. It's taken a lot, not all, but a lot of the pain a= nd > time consuming nature of learning all the ins and outs of a NAS appliance > from the equation. > > FreeBSD have very well done man pages. I simply read them. > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 17:22:33 +0200 (CEST) > From: Wojciech Puchar > To: Zaphod Beeblebrox > Cc: freebsd-fs , FreeBSD Hackers > > Subject: Re: The small installations network filesystem and users. > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DUS-ASCII; format=3Dflowed > > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but amidst discussions of pNFS (among other > > things) I thought I should bring up something someone said to me: and > that > > is (to quote him) "using NFS is too hard, I always fail." > > Never had problems with NFS. And i'm using in regularly. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:11:40 +0200 > From: Eduardo Morras > To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: The small installations network filesystem and users. > Message-ID: <20160628181140.933d144cd5d830275e4be6c3@yahoo.es> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1 > > On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 21:04:45 +0800 > Julian Elischer wrote: > > > On 21/06/2016 1:56 PM, Gerrit K?hn wrote: > > > On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 22:00:31 -0400 (EDT) Daniel Eischen > > > wrote about Re: The small installations > > > network filesystem and users.: > > > > > > DE> We should support LDAP client out of the box, in base. What > > > DE> sucks now is that we need 3 packages (plus their dependencies) > > > DE> and multiple config files for ldap: > > > DE> > > > DE> pam_ldap > > > DE> nss_ldap > > > DE> openldap-client > > > > > > I only have to install/config ldap-clients every now and then, but > > > I would also strongly favour a more "integrated" setup (if that > > > requires having it in base is a different question, though). A few > > > weeks ago I used nss-pam-ldapd instead of pam_ldap and nss_ldap for > > > the first time, and it appeared to work with a bit less of a hassle > > > for me (otoh, I don't do any funky things here, I just need a > > > replacement for what we did with NIS something like 20 years ago). > > > > +1 > > I just had to reinstall certs for my server. which means copying > > certs to several places (in a default config) > > sendmail and syrus ad openssl (base) all look in different places. > > you COULD make them all look in the same place > > but that requires undersanding what is going on and not just cribbing > > the config file off the net somewhere. > > I use dhcpd to pass that configuration. On system startup, dhclient > asks to dhcpd server the ip, time-ntp, dns, and configuration for its > current job (pkgs/ports to install, apache conf, postgres conf, certs, > etc..) > depending on it's intended current use. I followed an old paper from > EuroBSDCon,... this > http://2004.eurobsdcon.org/uploads/media/EBSD04_slides_41.pdf to do the > setup. Easier and faster (at least for me) than ldap and related for > server setup. For user management, don't know, I don't have jelly > users, only daemons. > > > > > I think ports and pkg are fine, but we need to have some more thought > > put into how they all go together. > > > > --- --- > Eduardo Morras > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " > > ------------------------------ > > End of freebsd-hackers Digest, Vol 689, Issue 2 > *********************************************** >