Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:12:25 -0400
From:      <scratch65535@att.net>
To:        Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ports <ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: gtkmm30 fails to build under 10.3
Message-ID:  <h4c9pchl3v7m431cs5bed2jp8he0hl1cd6@4ax.com>
In-Reply-To: <378r-8cln-wny@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <9la9pch88dj02bs7ts4r1cfa7lgvnssh28__31177.0872948275$1502915924$gmane$org@4ax.com> <378r-8cln-wny@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[Default] On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 22:46:44 +0200, Jan Beich
<jbeich@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

><scratch65535@att.net> writes:
>
>> Package dependency requirement 'giomm-2.4 >= 2.49.1' could not be
>> satisfied.
>> Package 'giomm-2.4' has version '2.44.0', required version is '>=
>> 2.49.1'
>> Package dependency requirement 'pangomm-1.4 >= 2.38.2' could not
>> be satisfied.
>> Package 'pangomm-1.4' has version '2.36.0', required version is
>> '>= 2.38.2'
>> Package dependency requirement 'gtk+-3.0 >= 3.22.0' could not be
>> satisfied.
>> Package 'gtk+-3.0' has version '3.18.8', required version is '>=
>> 3.22.0'
>> Package dependency requirement 'cairomm-1.0 >= 1.12.0' could not
>> be satisfied.
>> Package 'cairomm-1.0' has version '1.10.0', required version is
>> '>= 1.12.0'
>> Package dependency requirement 'gdk-pixbuf-2.0 >= 2.35.5' could
>> not be satisfied.
>> Package 'gdk-pixbuf-2.0' has version '2.32.3', required version
>> is '>= 2.35.5'
>
>Upgrade dependencies as instructed or switch to binary packages.

That's all well and good, but searches turned up no reference to
giomm in package or in ports, only in includes, and only for 2.4.
I'd guess that that compiland, at least, doen't have an
independent existence--since if it does,  it should have been
fetched by the makefile.  But I'm open to suggestion, if you know
where the latest-and-greatest bits are.  

(I just tried to build gtkmm20 as a fallback, and it failed too,
finding many undefined references, and finally failing with a
linker problem it wouldn't tell me about.  I added the -v to
ldflags and tried again, but  it only repeated the request that I
use the -v flag.  The actual call to ld seems to be somewhere
other than the makefile)

>
>http://beefy5.nyi.freebsd.org/data/latest-per-pkg/gtkmm30/3.22.0/103i386-default.log
>http://beefy4.nyi.freebsd.org/data/latest-per-pkg/gtkmm30/3.22.0/103i386-quarterly.log
>
>http://beefy6.nyi.freebsd.org/data/latest-per-pkg/gtkmm30/3.22.0/103amd64-default.log
>http://beefy2.nyi.freebsd.org/data/latest-per-pkg/gtkmm30/3.22.0/103amd64-quarterly.log
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
>https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?h4c9pchl3v7m431cs5bed2jp8he0hl1cd6>