From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Jun 30 12:16:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from gw.nectar.com (gw.nectar.com [209.98.143.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6408137BC84 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 12:16:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nectar@nectar.com) Received: from bone.nectar.com (bone.nectar.com [10.0.1.105]) by gw.nectar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B8B79B31; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:16:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: by bone.nectar.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 99B871DCB; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:16:10 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:16:10 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Doug White Cc: Haikal Saadh , chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IBM supercomputer Message-ID: <20000630141610.G91583@bone.nectar.com> References: <007e01bfe325$45a687e0$49a393cb@timberwolf> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu on Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 08:55:10AM -0700 X-Url: http://www.nectar.com/ Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 08:55:10AM -0700, Doug White wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, Haikal Saadh wrote: > > > OS/2 perhaps? Wasn't win95 'born' from OS/2? > > s/95/NT/ I think this is a common misconception. Windows NT did (does?) have a OS/2-like subsystem, but the resemblance ends there. NT was much more influenced by VMS, Mach, RSX11, and Windows 3.1 than OS/2. -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message