From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 14 06:47:21 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A7B16A4CF for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2003 06:47:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from siralan.org (12-223-227-231.client.insightbb.com [12.223.227.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898DB43D35 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2003 06:47:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mikes@siralan.org) Received: from siralan.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by siralan.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hBEElJSv049913 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2003 09:47:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mikes@siralan.org) Received: (from mikes@localhost) by siralan.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hBEElJmk049912 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2003 09:47:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mikes) From: "Michael L. Squires" Message-Id: <200312141447.hBEElJmk049912@siralan.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org (FreeBSD current mailing list) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 09:47:18 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20031214125008.BD6E475CB@mail.snowfall.se> from "Stefan Cars" at Dec 14, 2003 01:50:11 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: SMP-stability with 5.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 14:47:22 -0000 > How good is the SMP-stability on 5.2. I'm currently running 4.9 on some > non-critical servers and I'm thinking of installing 5.2, how good is the > SMPng now ? I have one Supermicro P6DGH running SMP under 4.9-STABLE, and another under 5.2-CURRENT; both are very reliable. I'm considering switching my nat box and server over to 5.2-RELEASE since all the various ports I use are now compiling and executing out-of-the-box with 5.2-CURRENT. The other reason for moving is that I'll have 5.x NFS everywhere, which gets rid of the statd/lockd differences between 4.x and 5.x. The only thing I'll miss is xperfmon3, which has to be revised to use the new NFS structures (at least). Mike Squires