From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 28 16:50:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1405D16A4CE for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:50:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bsdie.tunasafedolphin.org (tunasafedolphin.org [207.44.144.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F5FC43D2D for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:50:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from james@tunasafedolphin.org) Received: from webmail.tunasafedolphin.org (bsdie.tunasafedolphin.org [127.0.0.1])i9SGqNro022770; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 12:52:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from james@tunasafedolphin.org) Received: from adsl-068-209-252-201.sip.asm.bellsouth.net ([68.209.252.201]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user james@tunasafedolphin.org); by webmail.tunasafedolphin.org with HTTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 12:52:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <63774.68.209.252.201.1098982344.squirrel@68.209.252.201> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 12:52:24 -0400 (EDT) From: "James Skinner" To: TM4525@aol.com User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: drew@mykitchentable.net cc: synrat@wirewalk.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dummynet X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:50:39 -0000 > Why don't you guys stop torturing yourself and wasting $1000s worth > of your time and get yourself some real bandwidth management > software? Its cheaper in the long run. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Funny, I thought that's what Dummynet did. It seems that you wouldn't want to steer a user into a horribly overpriced closed-source rate-limiting solutuion when it's available for free in the OS. BTW: Nice email addr. ;)