From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sat Feb 20 22:29:37 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 312B2539B42 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 22:29:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Djjmd0jbqz4nZL for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 22:29:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 16846539D7D; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 22:29:37 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16518539D7C for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 22:29:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Djjmd03Y4z4nrH for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 22:29:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8A39271DD for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 22:29:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 11KMTaf5021936 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 22:29:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 11KMTaQZ021935 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 22:29:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 241490] x11-toolkits/qt5-gui: requires runtime dependency on mesa-dri Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 22:29:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: adridg@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kde@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 22:29:37 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D241490 Adriaan de Groot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|Closed |Open --- Comment #9 from Adriaan de Groot --- There's another way about this, and that is pkg-message (which would say "if you intend to use qt5-gui headless, install mesa-dri"). I'd forgotten about monsters like llvm. However, the point is this: - without mesa-dri, a Qt5-gui-using application can't run the GUI (dependin= g a little on which code paths it takes, I'm sure) - on the desktop, other things will pull in mesa-dri anyway So it comes down to: are uses of qt5-gui where an application (that uses qt5-gui) does *not* need mesa-dri? The original bug report has an n=3D1 inc= idence of "no". Perhaps futzing with the QPA will do it (e.g. set the QPA to use offscreen output; in which case I'd return to the pkg-message approach: at = some point you have to trust the user to put the parts together that cannot be guessed) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=