From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 19 21:23:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D821065672; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:23:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 344E08FC0C; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:23:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.topspin.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id XAA06871; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:23:33 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from localhost.topspin.kiev.ua ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.topspin.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1NXLXx-000IVb-Ak; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:23:33 +0200 Message-ID: <4B5622D4.2070602@icyb.net.ua> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:23:32 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091128) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Naumov References: <4B55FF44.4040308@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , mandrews@bit0.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, rnoland@freebsd.org, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE / gpart / GPT / marking a partition as "active" X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:23:40 -0000 on 19/01/2010 23:09 Dan Naumov said the following: >> After using gpart to create the GPT (and thus the PMBR and its >> bootcode), why not simply use "fdisk -a -1 DISKNAME" to set the PMBR >> partition active? > > According to the fdisk output, the partition flag did change from 0 to > 80. Can the "fdisk: Class not found" error showing up at the very end > of the procedure of doing "fdisk -a -1 DISKNAME" be safely ignored? Yes, I think so. -- Andriy Gapon