From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 3 20:36:38 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2632537B401 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 20:36:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.airnet.com.au (mail.airnet.com.au [202.174.32.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8314B43F85 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 20:36:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ws@senet.com.au) Received: (qmail 27717 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2003 03:36:34 -0000 Received: from dsl2-81.gw1.adl1.airnet.com.au (HELO predatorii) (202.174.37.81) by mail.airnet.com.au with SMTP; 4 Jul 2003 03:36:34 -0000 Message-ID: <0a9d01c341de$21c660a0$0264a8c0@ovirt.dyndns.ws> From: "W. Sierke" To: Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 13:11:19 +0930 Organization: OVirt Technologies MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: Recovering ext2fs partitions after crash X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2003 03:36:38 -0000 Hi, My 4.8 box died (after 70+ days) for reasons as yet unknown. I couldn't log in remotely or at virtual consoles, main console was completely unresponsive and I couldn't ctrl-alt-del so I had to hit reset. I've got the box back up but I can't mount my 2 ext2fs partitions (had to comment them out of /etc/fstab): # mount_ext2fs /dev/ad0s5 /mnt/store1 mount_ext2fs: /dev/ad0s5: Operation not permitted # e2fsck /dev/ad0s5 e2fsck 1.27 (8-Mar-2002) The filesystem size (according to the superblock) is 1281175 blocks The physical size of the device is 0 blocks Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupt! Abort? Uh-oh. That's not good! I don't think that "superblock" version of the size is correct, either. Any suggestions as to the best way to proceed from here? (Please don't use the dreaded "B" word! :) Thanks, Wayne