From owner-cvs-all  Sun Jul 28 20:42:33 2002
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7021D37B408
	for <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 28 Jul 2002 20:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.speakeasy.net (mail14.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.214])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D53C43E65
	for <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 28 Jul 2002 20:42:21 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (qmail 2961 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2002 03:42:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender <jhb@FreeBSD.org>)
          by mail14.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP
          for <ticso@cicely.de>; 29 Jul 2002 03:42:20 -0000
Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (laptop.baldwin.cx [192.168.0.4])
	by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6T3gJuR049043;
	Sun, 28 Jul 2002 23:42:19 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <XFMail.20020728234227.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.2 on FreeBSD
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <xzpeldnk0d8.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 23:42:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.cpu.mk
Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org,
	"David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>, ticso@cicely.de
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <cvs-all.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20cvs-all>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20cvs-all>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


On 28-Jul-2002 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely5.cicely.de> writes:
>> Ups - OK then I agree up to ev6.
> 
> Is that really the most common CPU amongst our Alpha users?  I get the
> impression a lot of people are running PWSes, which are ev56 machines
> unless I'm mistaken.  What does the DS10 / DS20 have?

It also depends on what the tuning does.  It maybe that -mtune=ev6 doesn't
perform any differently on an ev56 than -mtune=ev56, in which case you
might as well tune for an EV6 since it optimizes for the maximum number of
machines.

-- 

John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message