From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 10 06:59:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0479EFB for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 06:59:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from achill@smadev.internal.net) Received: from smadev.internal.net (adsltrust.ath.forthnet.gr [194.219.204.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101938FC0A for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 06:59:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter Received: from smadev.internal.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smadev.internal.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9A6bpV7047214 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:51 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from achill@smadev.internal.net) Received: (from achill@localhost) by smadev.internal.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q9A6bopF047213 for freebsd-java@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:50 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from achill@smadev.internal.net) From: Achilleas Mantzios To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re: java diablo-jdk Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:50 +0300 Message-ID: <1827608.yJKzdi0Quu@smadev.internal.net> Organization: Dynacom Tankers Mgmt User-Agent: KMail/4.8.4 (FreeBSD/8.3-RELEASE; KDE/4.8.4; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <5074C1D7.3040209@FreeBSD.org> References: <20121009231547.1f4cfa57@davenulle.org> <5074C1D7.3040209@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Achilleas Mantzios List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 06:59:55 -0000 On =C3=8E=C2=A4=C3=8F=C2=81=C3=8E=C2=B9 09 =C3=8E=C2=9F=C3=8E=C2=BA=C3=8F= =C2=84 2012 20:31:19 Jung-uk Kim wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 >=20 > On 2012-10-09 17:15:47 -0400, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: > > Hello, > >=20 > > I do not see the point to keep diablo-jdk as a build dependency of=20= > > java. Is there something that prevent us to distribute a package > > of openjdk, just to be able to built a native version of openjdk > > or sunjdk ? >=20 > No. The only problem is we have to provide entire sources + our > patches along with the tarball *somewhere*, just to comply with GPL. >=20 > > I'm tired of the "fetch the diablo-jdk from FreeBSD and agree with=20= > > the license". And even more since I use poudriere to build=20 > > packages. > >=20 > > The FreeBSD java support is not bad (I'm happy with it, I can do=20= > > all my Java developpement on FreeBSD using netbeans and openjdk)=20= > > but this dependency on diablo really sucks. We don't need this=20 > > IMO. >=20 > There are actually two possibilities, i.e., a) build openjdk from > completely open-sourced and bootstrap-less environment or b) > distribute special binary openjdk tarballs only for bootstrapping. b= ) > is pretty straight forward (albeit the source distribution problem) > and I am working on it as an interim solution. A preliminary port is= > here: >=20 > https://redports.org/browser/jkim/java/bootstrap-openjdk >=20 > However, I believe a) is the ultimate solution, e.g., ECJ/GCJ + GNU > classpath + CacaoVM/JamVM/Avian, etc. (VMKit/LLVM is in my wildest > dreams...) Do ECJ or GCJ produce same quality class bytecode as javac? >=20 > Jung-uk Kim > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ >=20 > iEYEARECAAYFAlB0wdcACgkQmlay1b9qnVM+bACgsja1GLV7UkPhY93Sp3lxK8UD > FF0AoNMlMzQjK4h0vweJCWolEWUhSRbF > =3D4IEx > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-java@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-java-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" - Achilleas Mantzios IT DEPT