From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 19 15:40:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FDE016A41F for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 15:40:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ducrot@poupinou.org) Received: from poup.poupinou.org (poup.poupinou.org [195.101.94.96]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 047CC43D46 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 15:40:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ducrot@poupinou.org) Received: from ducrot by poup.poupinou.org with local (Exim) id 1EHNkg-0007Cv-00; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:40:18 +0200 Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:40:18 +0200 To: Emanuel Strobl Message-ID: <20050919154018.GB24109@poupinou.org> References: <200509162117.17787@harrymail> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200509162117.17787@harrymail> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Bruno Ducrot Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: powerd (cpufreq) problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 15:40:21 -0000 On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 09:17:06PM +0200, Emanuel Strobl wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed that whenever my notebook (VAIO SRX41p, BETA4) crashed, powerd > prints the following error after reboot: > acpi_perf0: Px transition to 500 failed > acpi_perf0: set freq failed, err 6 > > I can't solve that state, no shutdown/reboot will fix it. _But_, if I boot > XP and reboot everything is fine again. > > I don't have problems if I do a clean shutdown and reboot FreeBSD. > There seems to be something in an invalid state while powerd is running > which powerd corrects at exit. > > Can I provide any useful info to get this fixed? I'm not planning to leave > XP on that machine just because I need it to "reset" cpufreq related > stuff ;) > Is this one with a PIII mobile and a PIIX4 southbridge? If yes, could you please try without acpi_perf but with smist instead? I think that even if you want to keep it working with acpi_perf I can write a simple userspace tool in order to get it working, but I don't think this can be commited though. Cheers, -- Bruno Ducrot -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care.