Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 09:01:08 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman <matthew@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org Subject: Re: p5-Email-Address woes Message-ID: <51EE3844.9030201@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20130723063323.GB4911@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu> References: <1374527699.28446.9223372036855832473.0B9F69C7@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20130723063323.GB4911@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 23/07/2013 07:33, milki wrote: > On 16:14 Mon 22 Jul , Mark Felder wrote: >> Is it possible a test-case could be made and used before committing >> updates to this port in the future? Or should we just yell loudly at >> upstream? > > Both are in order. As the maintainer is the general perl@, it would be > a little harder to make sure the maintainers and committers would all be > wary of the test-case though. > > The a solution could be to submit a regression test upstream and > patch the port for the current version if a patch is known. If no patch > is known, then it would be best to mark it broken for users who want > unicode support (conditional BROKEN if a PORT_OPTIONS:MUTF8 maybe?).kk I'll update the www/rt40 port to require p5-Email-Address>=1.895 this evening. Or rather >=1.89.8 given that's the current version in ports. Cheers, Matthew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51EE3844.9030201>