Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 11:25:30 GMT From: Sebastian Schulze Struchtrup <sebstruch@gmx.de> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/69425: Duplicated port? devel/arch vs. devel/tla Message-ID: <200407221125.i6MBPUON061682@www.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <200407221130.i6MBUKcA014815@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 69425 >Category: ports >Synopsis: Duplicated port? devel/arch vs. devel/tla >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Thu Jul 22 11:30:18 GMT 2004 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Sebastian Schulze Struchtrup >Release: >Organization: >Environment: general problem >Description: devel/arch and devel/tla are both ports for the gnu arch rcs. devel/arch is quite old, but devel/tla seems to be up to date. The command line interface of devel/arch is different, so it is probably desired to keep both of them in the tree. I heard of gnu arch, and installed the port, but it was the old one which was inconsistent to the documentation. Please correct me if I am mixing something up or if I misunderstood something. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: Probably the devel/arch port should be removed or a hint should be placed into the pkg-descr (pointing out that this is an old version). The current situation is somewhat confusing. >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200407221125.i6MBPUON061682>