From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 28 04:46:38 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 14AE816A4CE; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 04:46:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from blues.jpj.net (blues.jpj.net [208.210.80.156])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CAE7B43D1D; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 04:46:34 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from trevor@jpj.net)
Received: from blues.jpj.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by blues.jpj.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0SCkirr054353;
	Wed, 28 Jan 2004 07:46:44 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from trevor@jpj.net)
Received: from localhost (trevor@localhost)i0SCkilc054350;
	Wed, 28 Jan 2004 07:46:44 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: blues.jpj.net: trevor owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 07:46:44 -0500 (EST)
From: Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net>
To: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040123223812.GE84157@voodoo.oberon.net>
Message-ID: <20040128073442.W62139@blues.jpj.net>
References: <20040123170901.D40401@blues.jpj.net>
	<20040123223812.GE84157@voodoo.oberon.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39
cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
cc: questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: HEADS UP:  gettext
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:46:38 -0000

Kirill Ponomarew wrote:

> Why did you create this *-old *-new versions and not just
> updated gettext and bumped PORTREVISIONs for depended ports ?

The gettext-new idea is Jeremy Messenger's and it hasn't been implemented.

I figured that keeping gettext 0.12.1 available and having all ports still
use it would be the least disruptive thing, but I was wrong.  Sorry.
-- 
Trevor Johnson