Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 21:56:57 -0400 From: Tim Vanderhoek <vanderh@ecf.utoronto.ca> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@rush.net>, smp@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: async call gates Message-ID: <19990630215657.C7269@mad> In-Reply-To: <199907010100.SAA13352@usr09.primenet.com>; from Terry Lambert on Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 01:00:36AM %2B0000 References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990630102649.14320b-100000@cygnus.rush.net> <199907010100.SAA13352@usr09.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 01:00:36AM +0000, Terry Lambert wrote: > > 2) We can implement on top of the asynchronous (non-blocking) [...] > Rather than giving up our quantum, however, we change to > another set of registers, another program counter, and Is this the famous "It's my damn quantum" debate? -- This is my .signature which gets appended to the end of my messages. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990630215657.C7269>