Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 Aug 2023 21:16:02 -0700
From:      bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net>
To:        Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Bmake bad variable name
Message-ID:  <ZPAUAlS9dDGdjtnl@www.zefox.net>
In-Reply-To: <94FBA6B3-EA84-4B96-A87A-0A04C3E6EFE0@yahoo.com>
References:  <9B530FC9-ED6B-4B75-A731-D8F7D7586A51.ref@yahoo.com> <9B530FC9-ED6B-4B75-A731-D8F7D7586A51@yahoo.com> <ZO5EKKF9HVxhnCB3@www.zefox.net> <040CECBC-8A04-4049-91A7-0C1522000F5A@yahoo.com> <ZO/chSZgkn1SUXbp@www.zefox.net> <94FBA6B3-EA84-4B96-A87A-0A04C3E6EFE0@yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 06:08:06PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote:
> 
> http://www.zefox.net/~fbsd/poudriere_on_rpi4 looks unchanged
> just now, not just for this but for any changes. May be some
> other copy was changed or the old content is cached someplace?
> 
The file was updated  
-rw-r--r--   1 fbsd  fbsd     4076 Aug 30 17:34 poudriere_on_rpi4
Possibly I hit send before saving the changes. If you don't see
the changes after reloading the page please tell me.

> 
> But that buildworld buildkernel activity and rebooting to
> the new installed system and updating
> /usr/local/poudriere/poudriere-system should be done before
> even the "poudriere jail -c". The quoted material may be
> just out of order?

My question was where does the output of 
poudriere jail -c ... get written? I thought
it might be a dot file in /usr/ports or 
/usr/local/poudriere, but nothing is visible.

The sequence was 
1. update, build and install world and kernel
2. create /usr/local/poudriere
3. run in /usr/src the make commands to populate 
	/usr/local/poudriere/poudriere-system
4. run poudriere ports command (this is where I expected some write activity
5. run poudriere jail command
6. use poudriere

In the event of step 1 re-run step 3
In the event of major version change delete the jail 
and re-run step 5 with the new version number

Does that make more sense?
> 
> Late night operator error: "indented oddly" would
> be what I was intending.
> 

Ahhh, now I get it.

Thanks for writing!

bob prohaska




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ZPAUAlS9dDGdjtnl>