From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Dec 29 08:57:53 1994 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id IAA27755 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 29 Dec 1994 08:57:53 -0800 Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id IAA27749 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 1994 08:57:49 -0800 Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA00327 (5.67a/IDA-1.5); Thu, 29 Dec 1994 10:29:06 -0600 Received: by bonkers.taronga.com (smail2.5p) id AA00250; 29 Dec 94 10:09:31 CST (Thu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) with SMTP id KAA00246; Thu, 29 Dec 1994 10:09:30 -0600 Message-Id: <199412291609.KAA00246@bonkers.taronga.com> X-Authentication-Warning: bonkers.taronga.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: Wankle Rotary Engine Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: syslogd changes, second cut In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 29 Dec 94 10:02:32 EST." <199412291502.KAA02336@skynet.ctr.columbia.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.4.1 7/21/94 Date: Thu, 29 Dec 1994 10:09:21 -0600 From: Peter da Silva Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > I don't suppose I could convince you to make one more small change, namely > using getbootfile() to deternine the kernel name instead of hardcoding the > name 'kernel?' This is in printsys() where it refers to _PATH_UNIX? > This is also a nitpick, but... well, you know: thingie. :) Love to... is getbootfile() a 2.0 thing? "man getbootfile" says nothing, and I'm still working in 1.1.5.1 land 'cos my wife would kill me if I took this machine down for a week to upgrade it (and she didn't want me to get it in the first place!)... (wasn't the fellow's name "Wankel"?)