From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 18 02:35:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB8516A41F for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 02:35:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0034B43D4C for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 02:35:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix, from userid 80) id F2F1069A4E; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 21:35:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from 162.51.212.16 (SquirrelMail authenticated user wmoran) by www.potentialtech.com with HTTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 21:35:48 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43885.162.51.212.16.1132281348.squirrel@www.potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <003001c5ebe2$aa0e3040$8a0010ac@antonioh89t9q9> References: <003001c5ebe2$aa0e3040$8a0010ac@antonioh89t9q9> Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 21:35:48 -0500 (EST) From: "Bill Moran" To: "Antonio Gandara" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RST response in message log? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 02:35:50 -0000 Antonio Gandara wrote: > Hi, > > Just had a general question as to this message which appeared in the > message > log file and dmesg. While I understand it is reducing response to packets, > I > am perplexed as to what causes this to happen? I am running 4.11 Release. > > Nov 16 11:07:18 eagle /kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 300 > to > 200 packets per second While there are other things that could cause this, it's almost always indicative of a portscan. The RSTs are limited to prevent DoS attacks from generating overly huge amounts of traffic. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com