From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Oct  4 21:14:37 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 44AC816A4B3; Sat,  4 Oct 2003 21:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU
	[128.205.32.2])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 493D043FB1; Sat,  4 Oct 2003 21:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU)
Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (kensmith@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	h954EXus009775;	Sun, 5 Oct 2003 00:14:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from kensmith@localhost)
	by electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id h954EWUH009774;
	Sun, 5 Oct 2003 00:14:32 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 00:14:32 -0400
From: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU>
To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org>
Message-ID: <20031005041432.GC9334@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU>
References: <20031004190337.GB94900@sunbay.com>
	<200310041930.h94JUCYJ065458@grimreaper.grondar.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200310041930.h94JUCYJ065458@grimreaper.grondar.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
cc: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: docs/50349: make release fails with NO_OPENSSH and ! NOKERBEROS
X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2003 04:14:37 -0000

On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 08:30:12PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote:

> The crypto stuff in nicely separated out, and I wouldn't mind seeing
> further separation (dev tools, LPR, sendmail, etc) done as separately
> installable components, similar to the crypto install.

A current interest is having some sort of binary updates system
in place.  Everyone I talk to about the various issues, projects in
motion, etc. say this further separation of stuff would help that
effort a LOT.

-- 
						Ken Smith
- From there to here, from here to      |       kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu
  there, funny things are everywhere.   |
                      - Theodore Geisel |