From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 12 19:13:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08FF106566C for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:13:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jelischer@fusionio.com) Received: from mx1.fusionio.com (mx1.fusionio.com [66.114.96.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 795BB8FC1D for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:13:04 +0000 (UTC) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1305226667-03d6a50f3070280001-HFAwnd Received: from zim.fusionio.com ([10.101.1.182]) by mx1.fusionio.com with ESMTP id biD9Tp0kcgR25aj2; Thu, 12 May 2011 12:57:47 -0600 (MDT) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: jelischer@fusionio.com Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zim.fusionio.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69EBD4500002; Thu, 12 May 2011 12:57:48 -0600 (MDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.581 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.581 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_50=0.001, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, FH_DATE_PAST_20XX=3.188, RDNS_NONE=0.1] Received: from zim.fusionio.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zim.fusionio.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XC1xkm1ihVQC; Thu, 12 May 2011 12:57:48 -0600 (MDT) Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (unknown [10.50.30.115]) by zim.fusionio.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D64F54500001; Thu, 12 May 2011 12:57:47 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <4DCC2D95.8090503@fusionio.com> Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 14:57:25 -0400 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.4; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Devin Teske , "hackers@freebsd.org" References: <6955841F-C3C1-4C7D-8BA4-F8EBBF60F69B@vicor.com> <20110504103743.8d9f19d5.ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> <2F3440C0-6EDB-4CD5-A269-4791AB89AA96@vicor.com> <004501cc10d0$6aaa2800$3ffe7800$@vicor.com> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [UPDATE] New Boot-Loader Menu -- version 1.3 In-Reply-To: <004501cc10d0$6aaa2800$3ffe7800$@vicor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Barracuda-Connect: UNKNOWN[10.101.1.182] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1305226667 X-Barracuda-URL: http://10.101.1.180:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at fusionio.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.12 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.12 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.0 tests=CN_BODY_332 X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.63543 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.12 CN_BODY_332 BODY: CN_BODY_332 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 12 May 2011 19:32:54 +0000 Cc: Subject: Re: [UPDATE] New Boot-Loader Menu -- version 1.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 19:13:05 -0000 On 5/12/11 2:14 PM, Devin Teske wrote: >> On May 4, 2011, at 1:37 AM, Emanuel Haupt wrote: >> >>> Devin Teske wrote: >>> >>> Hey all, >>> >>> Proud to bring you version 1.3 which completes the followup >>> suggestions made by Olivier Smedts (use autoboot_delay instead of >>> loader_menu_timeout and change dc_seconds to loader_delay) and a >>> couple other minor enhancements/fixes. >>> >>> I think that brings everything up to speed with the phenomenal >>> feedback provided so far. Really, thank you all very much. >>> >>> Get your update at http://druidbsd.sf.net/ or >>> http://druidbsd.sourceforge.net/download/loader_menu-1.3.tgz >> Devin, have you thought about writing a port [1]? I'd be happy to >> review it: port would be good for 8 it'll be in 9 by default (we just decided a the devsummit) (if there are no roadblocks) >> [1] > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/own-port.html > I'm going to see if I can't make it perfectly acceptable for base first. If the > final version gets rejected for submission to base, I'll turn to ports. > > On a side-note, it'd be a pretty interesting port... considering the fact that > I'm already distributing it as a FreeBSD package (what would the Makefile for > that port look like... a call to fetch followed by a call to pkg_add ?? lol -- > are there other ports that already work like that?). Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, its contents and any attachments to it are confidential to the intended recipient, and may contain information that is privileged and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender and destroy the original e-mail message and any attachments (and any copies that may have been made) from your system or otherwise. Any unauthorized use, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information is strictly prohibited.