From owner-freebsd-questions Fri May 5 13: 0:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from privatecube.privatelabs.com (privatecube.privatelabs.com [198.143.31.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F4EC37BC77 for ; Fri, 5 May 2000 13:00:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mi@privatelabs.com) Received: from misha.privatelabs.com (root@misha.privatelabs.com [198.143.31.6]) by privatecube.privatelabs.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id OAA19991 for ; Fri, 5 May 2000 14:59:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from privatelabs.com (mi@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by misha.privatelabs.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA52303 for ; Fri, 5 May 2000 16:00:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi@privatelabs.com) From: mi@privatelabs.com Message-Id: <200005052000.QAA52303@misha.privatelabs.com> Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 16:00:21 -0400 (EDT) Subject: HylaFAX on 4.0-stable To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Does the subject for anyone? I commented out the FORBIDDEN line in the port's makefile (on a single user machine I don't care). It built-installed Ok, but when I try faxing, the faxq daemon that gets spawned of starts eating an entire CPU (fortunately, the machine has two) and nothing gets sent. According to ktrace/kdump -l, the process makes no system calls either, so it must be in a tight loop somewhere :( I thought, this may be due to my optimizations flags, but, as expected, a recompiled with '-g -O' faxq behaves the same. Any other experiences? Thanks! -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message