From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Nov 5 11:41: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from blackhelicopters.org (geburah.blackhelicopters.org [209.69.178.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5338837B419 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 11:41:01 -0800 (PST) Received: (from mwlucas@localhost) by blackhelicopters.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA91852; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 14:40:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mwlucas) Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 14:40:59 -0500 From: Michael Lucas To: Michael Sierchio Cc: "stable@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: DIRPREFS revisited Message-ID: <20011105144059.A91828@blackhelicopters.org> References: <3BE6E993.73F61814@tenebras.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <3BE6E993.73F61814@tenebras.com>; from kudzu@tenebras.com on Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 11:33:39AM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Just 4.4-STABLE. The only things that get merged into a -SECURITY branch are, as the name suggests, security hole fixes. Dirprefs is cool, but it doesn't address any security issues. On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 11:33:39AM -0800, Michael Sierchio wrote: > > Apologies for asking at this late date, but are the DIRPREFS changes reflected > in 4.4-SECURITY, or just 4.4-STABLE? Thanks. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Michael Lucas mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org http://www.blackhelicopters.org/~mwlucas/ Big Scary Daemons: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/q/Big_Scary_Daemons To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message