From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Apr 19 11:52:02 1995
Return-Path: questions-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA26092
          for questions-outgoing; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 11:52:02 -0700
Received: from cs.weber.edu (cs.weber.edu [137.190.16.16])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id LAA26085
          for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 11:51:59 -0700
Received: by cs.weber.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1.1)
	id AA19435; Wed, 19 Apr 95 12:43:24 MDT
From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert)
Message-Id: <9504191843.AA19435@cs.weber.edu>
Subject: Re: PPP and dynamic IPs drifting a little
To: fortin@zap.zap.qc.ca (Denis Fortin)
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 95 12:43:23 MDT
Cc: fenner@parc.xerox.com, jleppek@suw2k.ess.harris.com,
        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, karl@mcs.net, kozowski@structured.net
In-Reply-To: <199504191201.IAA05394@zap.zap.qc.ca> from "Denis Fortin" at Apr 19, 95 08:01:53 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL52]
Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > It looks like structured.net and net99 are advertising 192.168.1.x to the 
> > Internet (well, MAE-EAST, at least), in violation of RFC1597.  They should 
> > stop.
> 
> Ok, so who is going to send them mail to complain?

Funny, my router won't let me get an SMTP connection to send the mail.
8-)  8-) 8-).


					Terry Lambert
					terry@cs.weber.edu
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.