From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 23 16:02:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC81A16A4CE for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2003 16:02:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from solo.cs.vu.nl (solo.cs.vu.nl [130.37.24.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2407243FA3 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2003 16:02:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ronald@echteman.nl) Received: from henk.thuis.klop.ws (dyn16.dialup.cs.vu.nl [130.37.192.48]) by solo.cs.vu.nl with esmtp (Smail #87) id m1AO4BA-0009KrC; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 01:02 +0100 Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 01:02:09 +0100 To: FreeBSD Questions From: Ronald Klop Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera7.21/FreeBSD M2 build 497 Subject: order in fstab and md/mfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 00:02:14 -0000 Hello, Today I noticed my mfs on /tmp not mounting properly, because of the order of the entries in fstab. Mfs can't be mounted too early. Is this meant to be or should there be a second stage for this mount, just like nfs mounts which are deferred until after the network is up. I saw it is documented in one line in 'man fstab', that order is important, but not many examples about this. Running 5.2-BETA cvsupped today on P-II 400Mhz (UP), 256 MB, IDE. Ronald. -- Ronald Klop Amsterdam, The Netherlands