From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 21:32:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 681A216A421 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 21:32:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@childeric.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from smtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A720B43D5C for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 21:32:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@childeric.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.0.60] ([82.35.113.47]) by smtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 21 Oct 2005 22:33:27 +0100 Message-ID: <43595E64.1080205@childeric.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 22:32:20 +0100 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4356D354.5020509@childeric.freeserve.co.uk> <200510200239.30500.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> <20051020025214.GA91039@holestein.holy.cow> <200510201552.44041.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> In-Reply-To: <200510201552.44041.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Oct 2005 21:33:27.0577 (UTC) FILETIME=[12E3B890:01C5D687] Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: port config questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 21:32:38 -0000 RW wrote: > > I have 470 ports installed, that's a lot of Makefiles to check for changes. This was the issue for me. I am gradually developing a package server for a suite of desktops, adding more ports as required by the desktop users. In my original post I was imagining a utility akin to mergemaster but for port options which would let me step through the Makefiles of the ports which portmanager identified as updateable. In the meantime I will be playing with pm-020.conf as suggested by a previous poster. Chris