From owner-freebsd-audit Fri Jun 22 9:32:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-audit@freebsd.org Received: from coffee.q9media.com (coffee.q9media.com [216.94.229.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F99737B407; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:32:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@q9media.com) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (vega.tct.net [216.94.230.13]) by coffee.q9media.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f5MGirL85366; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:44:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@q9media.com) User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022 Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:32:26 -0400 Subject: Re: whois(1) patch From: Mike Barcroft To: Cc: Mike Heffner , , Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20010622033201.B506@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Organization: q9 media Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 6/22/01 6:32 AM, David O'Brien at obrien@freebsd.org wrote: > You should separate your patches into functionality and style(9). > I see DES just committed this patch as is, rather than break it into two > parts as our practices says it should have been. Sorry. I'll make sure I do this in future. > You also changed puts() to printf(). Was there a reason for making that > change? style(9): Use printf(3), not fputs/puts/putchar/whatever; it's faster and usually cleaner, not to mention avoiding stupid bugs. Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message