From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 26 11:12:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C63D1065670 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 11:12:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from sakura.ccs.furiru.org (sakura.ccs.furiru.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:8060::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC9588FC15 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 11:12:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (authenticated bits=0) by sakura.ccs.furiru.org (unknown) with ESMTP id o4QBC8A5053119; Wed, 26 May 2010 20:12:11 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 20:12:08 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20100526.201208.27863135.nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org> To: pluknet@gmail.com From: TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro In-Reply-To: References: <201005251513.o4PFD490071374@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 22.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 11:12:14 -0000 In article pluknet writes: > Just wonder why apic is still commented out in pc98's GENERIC. > Is there a reason to keep things intact? > It was inherited from i386 port in time when it was commented out. Because, most of pc98 does not have APIC. In addition, SMP support on pc98 is broken. --- TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro