Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 24 Sep 1998 09:15:20 +0200 (CEST)
From:      hm@kts.org (Hellmuth Michaelis)
To:        joki@kuebart.stuttgart.netsurf.de (Joachim Kuebart)
Cc:        isdn@FreeBSD.ORG, hm@kts.org
Subject:   Re: Problem with Q.931 implementation
Message-ID:  <m0zM5cW-00000hC@bert.kts.org>
In-Reply-To: <199809231921.VAA00494@shire.domestic.de> from Joachim Kuebart at "Sep 23, 98 09:21:24 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Joachim Kuebart wrote:

> Sep 23 21:05:45 shire /kernel: i4b-L3-i4b_decode_q931_message: STATUS message
> Sep 23 21:05:45 shire /kernel: i4b-L2-i4b_i_frame_queued_up: V(S) == ((V(A) + k) & 127)!
> Sep 23 21:05:45 shire /kernel: i4b-L2-i4b_i_frame_queued_up: state = ST_MULTIFR
> Sep 23 21:05:45 shire /kernel: i4b-L2-i4b_print_l2var: unit0 V(R)=13, V(S)=11, V(A)=10,ACKP=0,PBSY=0,OBSY=0

This looks exactly like a phenomenon i had here and which took me several 
weeks to debug. This is fixed in my sources of i4b.

hellmuth
-- 
Hellmuth Michaelis                hm@kts.org                   Hamburg, Europe
 We all live in a yellow subroutine, yellow subroutine, yellow subroutine ...

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m0zM5cW-00000hC>