From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Thu Oct 15 17:33:03 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8A3A15F87; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:33:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2AC6180F; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:33:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id C1129184B; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:33:03 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r399250 - in head: . devel devel/mongo-cxx-driver devel/mongo-cxx-driver/files Message-ID: <20151015173303.GC77492@FreeBSD.org> References: <201510141111.t9EBBfLS022109@repo.freebsd.org> <20151015120250.GB43539@FreeBSD.org> <20151015172213.GI1019@fc.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151015172213.GI1019@fc.opsec.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:33:03 -0000 On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 07:22:13PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:11:41AM +0000, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > > New Revision: 399250 > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/399250 > > > > > > Log: > > > Re-introduce port: devel/mongo-cxx-driver > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > There was an old port, which was not staged. > > > > In this case, why it was not properly resurrected? > > Lazyness on my part, as there are 400+ other "New"er PRs in the queue. > > I just took one from the stale end of the queue to get that queue > a tiny, tiny bit shorter. Nonetheless, I'd kindly ask you (and everyone else reading) to do "svn cp" when resurrecting previously removed port, as instructed by PHB and common sense, thank you. ./danfe